+ [2020-04-01T22:44:52Z] sbeyer I first thought I could ignore the failure and then use "if: success() run: exit 1" but that doesn't work because the ignored failure is always considered as success
+ [2020-04-01T22:45:51Z] sbeyer ah, I got an idea ;)
+ [2020-04-01T22:57:03Z] sbeyer typical case of rubber duck debugging
+ [2020-04-01T23:49:45Z] cornfeedhobo BtbN: that is what i meant. without getting into the pedantics of ancestor changes, i was looking for a way to derive the state in the moment. but i found a solution

message no. 178775

Posted by sbeyer in #github at 2020-04-01T22:43:23Z

is there a way to inverse an exit code in GitHub Workflows? I mean I want to fail if an invoked action succeeds, and succeed if an invoked action fails
+ [2020-04-02T02:02:17Z] independent YOU CANT HACK MY SERVER sickvpn.iownyour.biz ADMIN 1qazZAQ!!@#$ I DEFY YOU! IT'S NEAR IMPOSSIBLE!!!
+ [2020-04-02T05:23:42Z] wenxin hey folks, i create a .gitignore, but i have already tracked some files wich i need to ignored. what should i do?
+ [2020-04-02T07:56:55Z] deepy git add -f?
+ [2020-04-02T12:36:03Z] BPL Hi guys, i've just cloned this repo https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qt5.git/ and then just `git submodule update --init --recursive` and I've got couple of questions