+ [2020-06-02T23:51:38Z] nedbat cos: perhaps they say origin/the-branch-name ?
+ [2020-06-02T23:52:17Z] cos yes they do. I guess you're saying this branch may hve been deleted from origin while the rest were not? (which would also be really puzzling)
+ [2020-06-02T23:52:52Z] nedbat cos: no. you deleted them locally. origin still has them (probably). You still have your local idea of origin's branch. that's what "origin/the-branch" means.
+ [2020-06-02T23:55:27Z] cos I deleted all these branches locally, yes. So why would origin still have most of them, but be missing that one where the tag is? Maybe I can figure it out but it seems puzzling.
+ [2020-06-02T23:58:40Z] cos oh well, I'll stop trying to understand this now that I know I can use --all to see all the tags. I guess what I really want is to show all commits merged into master, that are more recent than a particular tag, even if that tag isn't in master.

message no. 181674

Posted by cos in #github at 2020-06-02T23:58:40Z

oh well, I'll stop trying to understand this now that I know I can use --all to see all the tags. I guess what I really want is to show all commits merged into master, that are more recent than a particular tag, even if that tag isn't in master.
+ [2020-06-03T00:00:04Z] cos I guess I could do that in two steps, first --all and capture the hash for the tag, then git log hash..HEAD
+ [2020-06-03T00:09:36Z] nedbat cos: hash..HEAD won't do what you want if they aren't on the same line
+ [2020-06-03T00:11:16Z] nedbat cos: also, you can get the hash for a tag with: git rev-parse tagname
+ [2020-06-03T00:30:31Z] cos oh that's useful.
+ [2020-06-03T00:31:07Z] cos and I think that is what I want - though git is convoluted enought that if it's not what I want it may take a long time to figure it out :/