+ [2013-05-22T21:55:27Z] travis-ci [travis-ci] mojombo/jekyll#962 (master - 8ab4915 : Matt Rogers): The build is still failing.
+ [2013-05-22T21:55:27Z] travis-ci [travis-ci] Change view : https://github.com/mojombo/jekyll/compare/8d87d4ee3009...8ab49151822f
+ [2013-05-22T22:05:08Z] travis-ci [travis-ci] Change view : https://github.com/mojombo/jekyll/compare/8ab49151822f...afc5cf098a18
+ [2013-05-22T22:05:08Z] travis-ci [travis-ci] Build details : http://travis-ci.org/mojombo/jekyll/builds/7408375
+ [2013-05-22T22:05:08Z] travis-ci [travis-ci] mojombo/jekyll#963 (master - afc5cf0 : Parker Moore): The build is still failing.

message no. 1844

Posted by BonSequitur in #jekyll at 2013-05-22T19:53:08Z

No, I totally understand that. I felt the complexity cost was low enough that it was worth doing as a part of Jekyll, especially since it's totally transparent to users who are doing it the way it works currently.
+ [2013-05-23T01:14:01Z] travis-ci [travis-ci] jpiasetz/jekyll#4 (master - 3d9a32f : John Piasetzki): The build is still failing.
+ [2013-05-23T01:14:01Z] travis-ci [travis-ci] Build details : http://travis-ci.org/jpiasetz/jekyll/builds/7412038
+ [2013-05-23T01:14:01Z] travis-ci [travis-ci] Change view : https://github.com/jpiasetz/jekyll/compare/614fb519406f...3d9a32fc64dc
+ [2013-05-23T02:58:54Z] clume I was able to install kramdown and coderay. It is working for *.markdown pages but does not code syntax for .html page. Is that possible to do?
+ [2013-05-23T03:07:38Z] clume I know it's scanning my .html pages because I'll get an error if I specify a syntax language that doesn't exist