+ [2015-03-24T20:27:54Z] frymaster personally, I'd fork the offical one on github, then clone your fork locally, then add the original as another remote (say, "upstream"). push/pull from your own most of the time, but every now and again to a "pull upstream" and bring in their changes
+ [2015-03-24T20:28:57Z] codydh frymaster: That makes a ton of sense. Thanks much!!
+ [2015-03-24T20:49:30Z] gitinfo codydh: [!fork_sync] You can read a nice guide on how to update your fork with the upstream repository here: https://help.github.com/articles/syncing-a-fork
+ [2015-03-24T20:49:29Z] VxJasonxV codydh: !sync
+ [2015-03-24T20:50:07Z] codydh VxJasonxV: Ah cool, that's good to know.. thank you!

message no. 85828

Posted by codydh in #github at 2015-03-24T20:26:39Z

Or are those even different things? Haha. Not sure if I get both remotes if I use github.com to clone
+ [2015-03-25T00:14:03Z] p3lim What scopes are required to read and write comments on commits?
+ [2015-03-25T00:14:11Z] p3lim For any repo, not just the ones you own
+ [2015-03-25T00:51:15Z] VxJasonxV p3lim: public repositories? no scope
+ [2015-03-25T00:51:18Z] VxJasonxV private ones? repo scope
+ [2015-03-25T00:51:23Z] VxJasonxV oh, write comments. ummm