latest 20 messages by deecee

+ [2016-10-20T14:54:56Z] deecee thanks Zarthus, that's a good point
+ [2016-10-20T05:28:56Z] deecee either they have a (semi)unique name, or the name is nothing but a description, like ExcelDataReader and CacheManager
+ [2016-10-20T05:27:13Z] deecee looking at some of the popular repos, most of them seem to do one or the other
+ [2016-10-20T05:16:49Z] deecee for example, if you arbitrarily decide that the lib is called Banana, do you name the repo "banana" or do you name it "banana-email-lib"?
+ [2016-10-20T05:14:48Z] deecee hello all. i'm wondering, is it better to include SOME descriptive words in your repo name?
+ [2015-08-18T17:19:59Z] deecee ah, good luck then
+ [2015-08-18T17:16:45Z] deecee Bruce_Dev: was it openhatch?
+ [2015-08-18T17:11:51Z] deecee i think I know what you mean but I've also lost it
+ [2015-07-29T19:05:01Z] deecee if so: http://srcmvn.com/blog/2013/03/14/sending-a-pull-request-on-github-even-when-the-base-repository-you-want-is-missing
+ [2015-07-29T19:04:52Z] deecee manybubbles: is the list full?
+ [2015-07-29T19:03:37Z] deecee hm, good question
+ [2015-07-29T18:05:57Z] deecee yeah, thanks
+ [2015-07-29T18:05:43Z] deecee they haven't committed or accepted a PR in years
+ [2015-07-29T18:05:14Z] deecee ah, that's a good tip
+ [2015-07-29T18:05:04Z] deecee so, I won't even bother sending it, actually. I already sent one to the direct parent; that should be enough.
+ [2015-07-29T18:04:26Z] deecee it does happen to be abandoned. I'd be sending it in a "thought that counts" sort of way.
+ [2015-07-29T18:00:53Z] deecee yep
+ [2015-07-29T17:59:24Z] deecee why would I do that? the other fork has all the cool features.
+ [2015-07-29T17:58:53Z] deecee and then made a new fork to fix the bug?
+ [2015-07-29T17:58:38Z] deecee i think i might see what you're saying... are you saying that, when I discovered the bug in my copy, i should have checked the original to see if the bug was there?