latest 20 messages by deecee
+
[2016-10-20T14:54:56Z]
deecee
thanks Zarthus, that's a good point
+
[2016-10-20T05:28:56Z]
deecee
either they have a (semi)unique name, or the name is nothing but a description, like ExcelDataReader and CacheManager
+
[2016-10-20T05:27:13Z]
deecee
looking at some of the popular repos, most of them seem to do one or the other
+
[2016-10-20T05:16:49Z]
deecee
for example, if you arbitrarily decide that the lib is called Banana, do you name the repo "banana" or do you name it "banana-email-lib"?
+
[2016-10-20T05:14:48Z]
deecee
hello all. i'm wondering, is it better to include SOME descriptive words in your repo name?
+
[2015-08-18T17:19:59Z]
deecee
ah, good luck then
+
[2015-08-18T17:16:45Z]
deecee
Bruce_Dev: was it openhatch?
+
[2015-08-18T17:11:51Z]
deecee
i think I know what you mean but I've also lost it
+
[2015-07-29T19:05:01Z]
deecee
if so: http://srcmvn.com/blog/2013/03/14/sending-a-pull-request-on-github-even-when-the-base-repository-you-want-is-missing
+
[2015-07-29T19:04:52Z]
deecee
manybubbles: is the list full?
+
[2015-07-29T19:03:37Z]
deecee
hm, good question
+
[2015-07-29T18:05:57Z]
deecee
yeah, thanks
+
[2015-07-29T18:05:43Z]
deecee
they haven't committed or accepted a PR in years
+
[2015-07-29T18:05:14Z]
deecee
ah, that's a good tip
+
[2015-07-29T18:05:04Z]
deecee
so, I won't even bother sending it, actually. I already sent one to the direct parent; that should be enough.
+
[2015-07-29T18:04:26Z]
deecee
it does happen to be abandoned. I'd be sending it in a "thought that counts" sort of way.
+
[2015-07-29T18:00:53Z]
deecee
yep
+
[2015-07-29T17:59:24Z]
deecee
why would I do that? the other fork has all the cool features.
+
[2015-07-29T17:58:53Z]
deecee
and then made a new fork to fix the bug?
+
[2015-07-29T17:58:38Z]
deecee
i think i might see what you're saying... are you saying that, when I discovered the bug in my copy, i should have checked the original to see if the bug was there?