latest 14 messages by ojacobson
+
[2015-11-26T18:55:03Z]
ojacobson
I have +refs/pull/*/head:+refs/pull/* in my fetch specs for github repos for this very reason (that's one of the undocumented ways to do it)
+
[2015-11-26T18:54:28Z]
ojacobson
There are some undocumented ways to do it, or you can manually add the original repo as a remote and fetch it
+
[2015-11-26T18:54:15Z]
ojacobson
I don't believe the UI has such a feature.
+
[2015-11-26T18:25:15Z]
ojacobson
man git-clean
+
[2015-11-26T18:10:56Z]
ojacobson
Different credentials healpers, different git versions, different netrc/credentials cache contents...
+
[2015-11-26T03:14:09Z]
ojacobson
Classy, too: they sent it to folks who created gists during the affected time.
+
[2015-11-26T03:13:56Z]
ojacobson
Neat, Github sent out a security notice about the Gist thing.
+
[2015-11-25T21:14:29Z]
ojacobson
Yay
+
[2015-11-25T21:13:46Z]
ojacobson
Zarthus: the surprise is that secret gists were included in the non-logged-in list of your gists
+
[2015-11-25T20:51:02Z]
ojacobson
If you want a free bounty, ^
+
[2015-11-25T20:50:44Z]
ojacobson
we're apparently on a first-name basis with some Github folks
+
[2015-11-25T20:50:35Z]
ojacobson
Nah, I let $DAYJOB's security folks deal with it
+
[2015-11-25T20:41:16Z]
ojacobson
STR: 1. Create a secret gist. 2. Log out. 3. Look at your Gist list (https://gist.github.com/YOUR-USERNAME/) 4. surprise!
+
[2015-11-25T20:41:14Z]
ojacobson
PSA: "secret" gists on Github are broke as fuck right now