+[2015-09-11T20:07:14Z]nedbatNevik: yes :) +[2015-09-11T20:07:30Z]Nevikactually you can probably build very neatly onto that since it does the state tracking +[2015-09-11T20:07:43Z]Nevikjust have to build your initial state with some manual tinkering +[2015-09-11T20:09:18Z]nedbatNevik: yes, thanks for helping me to re-discover it :) +[2015-09-11T20:09:46Z]Nevikyou're welcome. if you build something that works, lemme know, i'm interested in how it'll end up working
message no. 111650
Posted by Nevik in #github at 2015-09-11T20:07:43Z
just have to build your initial state with some manual tinkering
+[2015-09-12T01:34:21Z]Hiltonhttps://github.com/hiltonjanfield/jquery.enhsplitter/network - those funky shaped arrows at the start (and the end) suggest that I really don't know what the hell I'm doing. +[2015-09-12T01:35:44Z]HiltonWhich is pretty much true. +[2015-09-12T04:08:52Z]WetmelonAnyone know if there's a way to restrict organization members to pull requests? It seems that if you give the members access to a repo, they can push directly to it no matter what. Would they have to fork it to accomplish what I want? +[2015-09-12T04:14:06Z]HiltonWetmelon: As I understand it, that's how it works. It says right on the Github page for Collaborators that it gives push access to the repository. That setting is for co-developers that you trust. +[2015-09-12T04:14:29Z]HiltonANYONE, however, can fork your public repository and send you a pull request with their changes.