+ [2020-04-13T23:39:21Z] jil BtbN. Thank you for the notice. I look quickly in git-lfs. but I don't need to version control that 'large' file. I'm doing visualisation using d3.js on observablehq.com and they offert to load some data from third party among wich github.
+ [2020-04-13T23:39:52Z] jil If I could I would not use git for this.
+ [2020-04-13T23:40:45Z] BtbN That's beyond stupid then. git is not made for large data files, and due to that is terrible at it.
+ [2020-04-13T23:40:50Z] BtbN Github bans large files for a reason
+ [2020-04-13T23:40:55Z] BtbN even 50M is already way too large

message no. 179259

Posted by jil in #github at 2020-04-13T23:39:21Z

BtbN. Thank you for the notice. I look quickly in git-lfs. but I don't need to version control that 'large' file. I'm doing visualisation using d3.js on observablehq.com and they offert to load some data from third party among wich github.
+ [2020-04-14T10:47:31Z] is_null hi all, is there any way to remove that a repo was forked from another ? it generates wrong pull request link
+ [2020-04-14T10:47:55Z] is_null really it's very different : This branch is 591 commits ahead, 220 commits behind coderholic:master.
+ [2020-04-14T10:48:02Z] is_null repo: https://github.com/jazzband/django-cities-light
+ [2020-04-14T10:52:34Z] jhass In my opinion it's still nice to show that attribution but you could just delete the fork, create a new repository by the same name and git push
+ [2020-04-14T10:53:21Z] is_null i'm all for showing the attributions, but having all generated PR links wrong is a really high price to pay