+ [2013-09-05T19:23:29Z] BrantB Hmm, I might try that. I'm only using rbenv because the setup page said "use either rbenv or rvm" and I flipped a coin.
+ [2013-09-05T19:25:13Z] jaybe between rvm and rbenv, the coin landed more in your favor. chruby is another, newer option. but again, homebrew lets you switch, system-wide, between ruby versions elegantly and perfeclty, without crap, as long as you don't need to be running more than one version of ruby at any one time.
+ [2013-09-05T19:27:33Z] BrantB I assume the latest version of 1.9.3 (p392) in Homebrew is fine for Octopress?
+ [2013-09-05T19:29:30Z] jaybe BrantB, i don't know about octopress' requirements
+ [2013-09-05T19:47:14Z] BrantB Hmm, I like the look of chruby too... Thanks for the advice.

message no. 7645

Posted by jaybe in #octopress at 2013-09-05T19:20:34Z

BrantB, if using homebrew, perhaps consider skipping rbenv altogether and just use `brew switch`. rbenv is kind of a pig.
+ [2013-09-06T00:11:34Z] pontiki i'm using chruby, after wrestling with rvm for too long one night
+ [2013-09-06T00:12:24Z] pontiki i did not know about brew switch
+ [2013-09-06T01:31:08Z] jaybe pontiki, i dig brew switch. has zero requirements. as i mentioned, works great if you don't need to be dynamically switching between ruby versions.
+ [2013-09-06T05:00:15Z] pontiki i'm pretty much on just one version now. however, there are the occasions i want to try something from 1.9.x
+ [2013-09-06T18:26:58Z] MisterLazer noob question: is there a proper way to merge in from the octopress repo? my current setup doesn't have anything tracking master, just a source branch