+ [2015-04-21T21:39:51Z] rdj y accurate?
+ [2015-04-21T21:54:34Z] parkr rdj: yep, no classes in YAML other than those pre-defined/whitelisted by SafeYAML
+ [2015-04-21T22:04:25Z] rdj And no existing extensibility point for post-load processing of the data files? I see plugin support for various things but not massaging data.
+ [2015-04-21T22:30:14Z] rdj Gonna take that as a yes, but I will check the log later. My compliments on your great documentation.
+ [2015-04-21T22:41:17Z] parkr rdj: 3.0 will have hooks, probably

message no. 90801

Posted by rdj in #jekyll at 2015-04-21T21:39:51Z

Hi, folks. Looks like the data YAML files provided structured data, but (since Jekyll uses SafeYAML which disables marshaling) there's no way to end up with typed data beyond the simple strings, numbers, lists, and dictionaries. So if you wanted any kind of resuable data processing, you'd have to do it with liquid filters or the like, you can't stick a data model between the YAML and your templates. Is that basicall
+ [2015-04-22T16:05:35Z] cjz hi, i want to start styling my jekyll pages to look like the rest of my site, im not finding any good examples of how to approach that
+ [2015-04-22T16:06:09Z] cjz do you nuke the existing .css and restyle everything?
+ [2015-04-22T16:56:15Z] cjz ?
+ [2015-04-22T17:29:19Z] parkr_ cjz: probably, depends on what you're starting with
+ [2015-04-22T17:29:29Z] parkr_ if you did `jekyll new`, just nuke `css/*` and `_sass/*`