latest 8 messages by glasser
+
[2013-06-28T16:52:41Z]
glasser
ah, that's one of those sentences that makes perfect sense once I know the answer and is kind of vague before. But you're right.
+
[2013-06-28T16:49:34Z]
glasser
it might be nice to mention this on http://octopress.org/docs/deploying/github/
+
[2013-06-28T16:49:20Z]
glasser
not the tradeoff I want to make, but looks great if you wanted to :)
+
[2013-06-28T16:48:57Z]
glasser
Ah well. That's what I figured, since that's how OctoPress gets to be more powerful than raw Jekyll
+
[2013-06-28T16:46:48Z]
glasser
pontiki_: sorry, when you say "it's not" do you mean "it's not the case" or "it's not different"? :)
+
[2013-06-28T16:31:11Z]
glasser
well, I'd rather not go through the effort of porting my existing blog to OctoPress if the answer is "no, I'll lose the feature of being able to fix typos in the web editor" :)
+
[2013-06-28T16:25:10Z]
glasser
Is that the case for OctoPress too or do I always need to run rake on a real computer?
+
[2013-06-28T16:24:57Z]
glasser
quick question. I'm thinking of switching from bare Jekyll to Octopress for a blog hosted on GH pages. One thing I like about Jekyll is that I can occasionally just edit stuff through the GH web editor (eg on a phone) and since GH Pages knows about Jekyll, it'll do the processing automatically for me.