+ [2013-05-28T19:28:41Z] zastaph seems :)

+ [2013-05-28T19:29:59Z] parkr with any major-level change (1 to 2 in this case) we should expect things to break

+ [2013-05-28T19:30:01Z] parkr :)

+ [2013-05-28T19:38:34Z] parkr lnwdr I think i left a message for you?

+ [2013-05-28T22:43:07Z] RobW_ Having some issues with globbing and exclude. Shouldn't **/*.xxx include the current directory too?

message no. 2233

Posted by parkr in #jekyll at 2013-05-28T12:25:37Z

lnwdr: it is there, yes, but it requires specific syntx

+ [2013-05-29T00:06:01Z] jaybe RobW_, no; that expression is specific; both must match to be true

+ [2013-05-29T00:06:42Z] RobW_ jaybe: Huh. Ruby globbing particularity? In unix style it matches the current.

+ [2013-05-29T00:06:56Z] RobW_ Although I am not sure why.

+ [2013-05-29T00:07:05Z] RobW_ The more that I look at it.

+ [2013-05-29T02:40:18Z] travis-ci [travis-ci] mojombo/jekyll#1010 (master - 86e72db : Matt Rogers): The build passed.

irc logs