+ [2015-01-29T20:49:16Z] mchelen here is a thread on the subject that looks interesting https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll/issues/1140
+ [2015-01-29T20:49:17Z] jekyllrb Title: Profiling site rendering performance · Issue #1140 · jekyll/jekyll · GitHub (at github.com)
+ [2015-01-29T20:50:04Z] mchelen mamluka: i know there are a bunch more static site generators out there, but i couldn't say which scales better than others
+ [2015-01-29T22:19:58Z] Rovanion If anyone feels like cracking a hard nut I'll reward you 50 rep on Stack Overflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27611488/jekyll-place-the-kramdown-table-of-contents-in-an-include-for-hash-navigation
+ [2015-01-29T22:19:59Z] jekyllrb Title: tableofcontents - Jekyll: Place the kramdown table of contents in an _include for hash navigation - Stack Overflow (at stackoverflow.com)

message no. 75790

Posted by jekyllrb in #jekyll at 2015-01-29T22:19:59Z

Title: tableofcontents - Jekyll: Place the kramdown table of contents in an _include for hash navigation - Stack Overflow (at stackoverflow.com)
+ [2015-01-30T05:00:27Z] travis-ci alfredxing/jekyll#133 (site-template-kerning) The build passed. http://travis-ci.org/alfredxing/jekyll/builds/48855027
+ [2015-01-30T05:00:28Z] jekyllrb Title: Travis CI - Free Hosted Continuous Integration Platform for the Open Source Community (at travis-ci.org)
+ [2015-01-30T05:00:52Z] CashewGuy Could someone tell me why this is happening? http://fyc.indiephilo.org/
+ [2015-01-30T05:01:44Z] oksushi is that the content of the _site directory? Because it looks like the unprocessed code
+ [2015-01-30T05:02:23Z] CashewGuy No, the index.html in _site is completely different