+ [2016-04-26T19:51:41Z] jekyllrb I do not know about 'pagination', but I do know about these similar topics: 'paginate'
+ [2016-04-26T19:51:51Z] jekyllrb (paginate) (#1) https://talk.jekyllrb.com/t/announcement-retiring-jekyll-paginate/1004, or (#2) https://github.com/octopress/paginate
+ [2016-04-26T19:51:51Z] jaybe [[paginate]] then
+ [2016-04-26T19:55:20Z] miklb maybe because most people expect it for a blog?
+ [2016-04-26T20:01:58Z] miklb That post about retiring it was confusing to me when I was making the switch earlier this year.

message no. 133524

Posted by jekyllrb in #jekyll at 2016-04-26T19:51:41Z

I do not know about 'pagination', but I do know about these similar topics: 'paginate'
+ [2016-04-27T00:15:32Z] travis-ci jekyll/jekyll#7370 (fix-multiple-backwards-compatibilizes) The build passed. https://travis-ci.org/jekyll/jekyll/builds/125982384
+ [2016-04-27T00:36:16Z] parkr that was only one
+ [2016-04-27T00:36:18Z] parkr from travis-ci
+ [2016-04-27T00:36:19Z] parkr hm
+ [2016-04-27T00:54:52Z] travis-ci jekyll/jekyll#7374 (3.0-stable) The build was broken. https://travis-ci.org/jekyll/jekyll/builds/125986948