+[2016-04-26T19:51:41Z]jekyllrbI do not know about 'pagination', but I do know about these similar topics: 'paginate' +[2016-04-26T19:51:51Z]jekyllrb(paginate) (#1) https://talk.jekyllrb.com/t/announcement-retiring-jekyll-paginate/1004, or (#2) https://github.com/octopress/paginate +[2016-04-26T19:51:51Z]jaybe[[paginate]] then +[2016-04-26T19:55:20Z]miklbmaybe because most people expect it for a blog? +[2016-04-26T20:01:58Z]miklbThat post about retiring it was confusing to me when I was making the switch earlier this year.
message no. 133527
Posted by miklb in #jekyll at 2016-04-26T19:55:20Z
maybe because most people expect it for a blog?
+[2016-04-27T00:15:32Z]travis-cijekyll/jekyll#7370 (fix-multiple-backwards-compatibilizes) The build passed. https://travis-ci.org/jekyll/jekyll/builds/125982384 +[2016-04-27T00:36:16Z]parkrthat was only one +[2016-04-27T00:36:18Z]parkrfrom travis-ci +[2016-04-27T00:36:19Z]parkrhm +[2016-04-27T00:54:52Z]travis-cijekyll/jekyll#7374 (3.0-stable) The build was broken. https://travis-ci.org/jekyll/jekyll/builds/125986948