+ [2014-09-04T17:55:14Z] mightyiam jaybe, but now I'm not getting it to include anything other than the index.html
+ [2014-09-04T17:57:50Z] mightyiam jaybe, I am actually, getting almost the desired behavior. I can get explicitly included files but not directories!
+ [2014-09-04T17:58:09Z] mightyiam It itches the most when it is so close
+ [2014-09-04T18:00:51Z] jaybe mightyiam, try '*/*' ?
+ [2014-09-04T18:02:24Z] mightyiam I don't have a problem excluding. I have a problem including.

message no. 45505

Posted by Volis in #jekyll at 2014-09-04T13:01:03Z

In case, I'm not clear. Should I do "jekyll new myblog" on my username.github.io repository or on a new repository for a new project page I'll call blog? And what difference will it make if I do either of them.
+ [2014-09-05T15:09:08Z] tortal jekyll isn't a web-server right? it outputs simply .html files which i can upload to any existing web server w/o any additional server-configuration - am i understanding correctly?
+ [2014-09-05T15:10:29Z] jbleuzen tortal: Yes, jekyll is not a web-server (there is a web-server embedded but you can't say jekyll is a web-server). Jekyll is site generator so you sum it up correctly, it "just" outputs .html
+ [2014-09-05T15:13:53Z] tortal thanks. I guess many are running it on the server-side to directly develop "in-place" ? maybe it has some extra configuations that can be made to simplify development if it resides on the server? Or is that just all the same, i.e. no advantage whatsoever to hve it installed on the server
+ [2014-09-05T15:15:50Z] jbleuzen generally people use it on there local machine and upload generates files on server with rsync (or other stuff), but github runs it on their server for github-pages feature
+ [2014-09-05T15:16:07Z] jbleuzen the choice is up to you, but I guess it easier to runs it on your computer